The Independent Whig
Challenging Conventional Wisdom about Conservatism and Liberalism. . . . "it ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. . . . . . . . . . . . It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- Home
- About
- Index of Posts
- Nine Challenges to Moral Foundations Theory
- The Cognitive Theory of Politics
- Thesis Part One – Introduction: What Divides Us, and How to Fix it
- Venn Diagram of Liberal and Conservative Traits and Moral Foundations
- Thesis Part Two – How Moral Foundations Affect Partisan Divisiveness (Updated 3/28/15)
- Thesis Part Three – Cognitive Style is a Moral Foundation
- Thesis Part Four – Recommendations (Update 3/28/15)
- Falsehoods and Truths
- Functions of Moral Foundations
- Taste Buds, Yin/Yang and Other Metaphors
- Favorite Passages
- al-Gharbi: Progressives and Conservatives are Different Types of People
- Arnade: Dignity
- Braestrup: Tree and Fruit
- Burke: The Nature of Man is Intricate. Restraints Are Rights
- Scott Adams: How Kanye showed the way to The Golden Age
- Transcripts of Heterodox Academy’s Open Mind Conference, June 15, 2018
- Session Seven: OPPORTUNITIES IN THE CLASSROOM: WHAT PROFESSORS CAN DO TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE
- Session One: A VIEW FROM THE ACADEMY: HOW A LACK OF VIEWPOINT DIVERSITY HARMS HIGHER EDUCATION
- Session Three: BIG QUESTIONS AND HETERODOX ANSWERS
- Session Five: A CONVERSATION WITH ROBERT ZIMMER
- Session Six: OPPORTUNITIES ON CAMPUS: THE POWER OF LEADERS AND ADMINISTRATORS
- Session Eight: OPPORTUNITIES BEYOND CAMPUS: POLITICS, POLICY, AND PHILANTHROPY
- Session Nine: OPPORTUNITIES IN EARLY DEVELOPMENT: EDUCATING TOMORROW’S COLLEGE STUDENTS
- Session Ten: CLOSING DISCUSSION: TOWARDS A MORE HETERODOX ACADEMY
- Coulter: Civil Rights Chickenhawks
- D’Souza
- D’Souza: The Megaphones of Our Culture
- D’Souza: The Big Switch, Part 1
- D’Souza: The Big Switch, Part 2
- D’Souza: Party of Slavery
- D’Souza: Two Civil Rights Revolutions
- D’Souza: Where Do Civil Rights Come From?
- D’Souza: The Original Civil Rights Revolution
- D’Souza: The Ku Klux Klan, Jim Crow, Segregation, and Separate but Equal
- D’Souza: The Segregation Solution
- D’Souza: Blaming the South
- D’Souza: Women’s Suffrage
- D’Souza: Woodrow Wilson, FDR, and LBJ
- D’Souza: The Second Civil Rights Revolution
- D’Souza: In Sum
- Grant: The Narcissism of Small Differences
- Haidt
- Haidt and Keller: The Closing of the Modern Mind
- Haidt: Crossing the Rubicon
- Haidt: The Unconstrained Vision Has the Worst Track Record in the History of Ideas
- Haidt: Two Incompatible Sacred Values in American Universities
- Haidt: Humans are 90 Percent Chimp and 10 Percent Bee
- Haidt: Teaching Students to Slur Rather Than Argue
- Haidt: The Divided Self (The Rider and the Elephant)
- Haidt: The Like-O-Meter
- Haidt: The Promethean Script
- Haidt: The Mind is a Story Processor, Not a Logic Processor
- Haidt: The Grand Narratives
- Haidt: Conservatives Understand Liberals Better Than Liberals Understand Conservatives
- Haidt: Conservatives Understand Human Nature Better Than Liberals
- Haidt: The Moral Matrix
- Haidt: Flatland/Spaceland
- Haidt: A Note On Innateness
- Haidt: The Hive Switch
- Haidt: Three Ethics Are More Descriptive Than One
- Haidt: Morality Defined
- Haidt: The Rationalist Delusion
- Haidt: The Rationalist Delusion – Part 2
- Haidt: The Rubicon of Shared Intent
- Haidt: WEIRD Morality and Style of Thought
- Haidt: The Conservative Advantage
- Haidt: The Left’s Blind Spot: Moral Capital
- Haidt: Naïve Realism
- Haidt: Transcript – When Compassion Leads to Sacrilege
- Hannan: The Cousins’ Wars
- Herman: Plato Versus the Founders
- Oakeshott: Two Types of Knowledge
- Muller: What is Conservative Social and Political Thought?
- Murray: The Difference Between Nice and Good
- Rauch: The Rise of Liberal Science
- Rauch: Various quotes from “Kindly Inquisitors”
- Shermer: Is Social Science Politically Biased?
- Sowell: Constrained and Unconstrained Visions – Introduction
- Sowell: The Left-Right Dichotomy
- Tierney: The Real War on Science
- Wallace: How to Think
- The Metaphor of the Moral Rainbow
- Links to Articles
- Quotes I Like
- Videos/Podcasts
//
archives
Asteroids
This tag is associated with 1 post
Jonathan Haidt’s Metaphors Sacrifice Completeness and Accuracy in Favor of Parsimony and Ideology, Part II: Taste Buds
This is Part II of a two-part essay in which I attempt to make the case that several of the metaphors Jonathan Haidt uses to help convey the lessons of his study of morality do more harm than good to his Moral Foundations Theory (MFT), to our understanding of the partisan divide, and potentially to … Continue reading →
I Support Viewpoint Diversity
A politically diverse group of social scientists, natural scientists, humanists, and other scholars who want to improve our academic disciplines and universities. We share a concern about a growing problem: the loss or lack of “viewpoint diversity.” When nearly everyone in a field shares the same political orientation, certain ideas become orthodoxy, dissent is discouraged, and errors can go unchallenged.
Important Posts
- Nine Challenges to Moral Foundations Theory
- The Cognitive Theory of Politics
- Falsehoods and Truths
- Conservatism is not Resistance to Change, it is Respect for Experience
- Religion, Morality, and Ideology: Different Names for the Same Underlying Element of Human Nature
- Religion, Morality, and Ideology: Like Things That Should Be Judged Alike.
- Liberty, Equality, Justice, and Fairness Have Different Meanings in Different Moral Matrices
- Toward a More Accurate Political Spectrum
- How to Better Articulate Conservatism (And Liberalism Too)
- Openness To New Ideas Is Not A Moral Foundation
- Do Liberals Really "Care" More?
- The Mike Romano Story
- Jonathan Haidt's Metaphors Sacrifice Completeness and Accuracy in Favor of Parsimony and Ideology, Part I: Yin/Yang
- Jonathan Haidt’s Metaphors Sacrifice Completeness and Accuracy in Favor of Parsimony and Ideology, Part II: Taste Buds
- What Moral Foundations Really Are and How They Help Us to Diagnose and Treat The Political Divide
- Moral Foundations Theory Explains Much More Than Just The Political Divide
Recommended Reading
- A Methodology Critique in Defense of Those Wascally Wepublicans
- Are Liberals More Intelligent than Conservatives? Another Broken Study Says It Is So
- Compromising with Moral Adolescence: A Losing Strategy
- More Than Dependency
- Our One-Eyed Friends
- Rationalism In Politics, Parts 1-3 of 5
- Rationalism In Politics, Parts 4-5 of 5
- Sufficient Reason: Dear Liberal…Here's Why I'm So Hostile
- The Argumentative Theory
- The Bright Future of Post-Partisan Social Psychology
- The Heretic
- The Political Spectrum (Part I): The Totalitarian Left from Communism to Social Democracy
- The Political Spectrum (Part II) — The Center: A Democracy or a Constitutional Republic?
- The Political Spectrum (Part III) – The Extreme Right: Anarchism
- The Quest for Cosmic Justice, by Thomas Sowell
- The Village Square
- WaPo: Let’s hold free speech guilty for the acts of a lunatic, shall we?
- You Can't Use Results To Determine Fairness and Justice
Recommended Videos
- "When Compassion Leads to Sacrilege," a talk by Jonathan Haidt
- Haidt concludes four part Righteous Mind symposium
- Kindly Inquisitors: The New Attacks on Free Thought, Newly Expanded Edition
- The Moral Roots of Liberals and Conservatives
- The Rationalist Delusion
- Two Incompatible Sacred Values in American Universities, Jon Haidt, Hayek Lecture Series, Duke University
An Interpretation of Jonathan Haidt’s Moral Foundations Theory
This sidebar lists a series of posts which together make up an essay relating Moral Foundations Theory to today's politics, and even a little history, as viewed through The Independent Whig's six-foundation moral lens.
- Introduction
- Overview: MFT Explains Much More Than Just The Political Divide
- Haidt’s Evenhandedness Dilutes the Message
- The Moral Mind
- The Moral Mind In Action
- The Complex Nature of Human Society
- Liberal and Conservative Moral Visions
- The Bees and the Hive: Liberal and Conservative Perceptions of Human Nature
- Liberty, Equality, Justice, and Fairness Mean Different Things in Different Moral Matrices
- Protecting the Weak
- Do Liberals Really “Care” More?
- Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: Conservatism is the Seedbed of Liberalism
- The Root Cause of the Political Divide
- Other Brief Thoughts: Haidt’s Yin/Yang, Moral Thinking, and Advice to Democrats
- Conclusion
- Recommendations
- Nutshells
Categories
Tag Cloud
A Conflict of Visions Authority/Subversion Binding Foundations Care/Harm Change the Path cognitive style Conservatism Constrained Vision Conventional Wisdom, Edmund Burke Education Equality Fairness Fairness/Cheating Flatland and Spaceland How to Train an Elephant Ideology Individual and Society Individualizing Foundations Intuitions come first Intuitive Primacy But Not Dictatorship Jonathan Haidt Justice Liberal Bias Liberalism Liberty Liberty/Oppression Literal and Conceptual Loyalty/Betrayal Moral Foundations Moral Foundations are Tools of Cognition Moral Foundations as Taste Buds Moral Foundations Theory Moraliies as Cuisines Moralities as Cuisines Morality Morality is about more than harm and fairness Moral Matrix Moral Thinking is for Social Doing Moral Vision Negative Fairness Ownership Pathological Altruism Political Divide Positive Fairness Rationalism Rationalist Rationalist Delusion Reason Reason and Experience Reason is for Winning Recommendations Religion Sanctity/Degradation Shiva/Vishnu six-foundation six-foundation morality Switch Synergy of Moral Foundations Taste Buds The Argumentative Theory The Bees and the Hive The Fallacy of Reason The Mike Romano Story The Milwaukee Theme Park The Rider and the Elephant, The Righteous Mind The Social Animal three-foundation three-foundation morality Unconstrained Vision Venn Diagram of Liberal and Conservative Moralities Vision Yin/Yang Yin/Yang MetaphorVenn Diagram of Liberal and Conservative Traits and Moral Foundations and
The Independent Whig 