you're reading...

Coddled Students’ Thinking Mirrors that of “The Terror”

The French Revolution was “one of the few places on earth where the rationalists got control of an entire country and were able to do with it what they wanted.” …  “A lot of people didn’t want to go along with the revolution, and of course they’re wrong because we know we’re right we have reason on our side.  They called themselves the party of reason, also the party of humanity. The French Revolutionaries ended up murdering hundreds of thousands of people.”  – Jonathan Haidt, Video: When Compassion Leads to Sacrilege (Transcript)

The same patterns of thought are being repeated today at universities across America; only the tools and methods have changed.   The aim now, as it was then, is to ensure that everyone thinks the right thoughts, and to prevent those who don’t from participating in “polite” society.  The tool of choice is no longer the guillotine.  Now it’s  screaming, making lists of demands, forced resignations, trigger warnings, anti-microaggression enforcement, anti-cultural appropriation police, etc., etc.  Even the idea of repealing the First Amendment, thus giving free reign for even more of this sort of authoritarian thought control, gains wide support among the coddled.

The party of “humanity,” (sic) were it to be implemented today, would impose an Orwellian “safe space” in which nobody has to suffer the discomfort of having their ideas challenged.  

The liberal TMC of teachers and administrators unintentionally allowed this to happen. They didn’t see it coming. Many of them still don’t see it for what it is. They’re children of the sixties and fellow travelers. They thought they were doing the right thing, some still do. The kids, swimming in that liberal water, took it to levels far beyond that which the TMC could have imagined.

18th Century Shaming


No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

I Support Viewpoint Diversity


A politically diverse group of social scientists, natural scientists, humanists, and other scholars who want to improve our academic disciplines and universities. We share a concern about a growing problem: the loss or lack of “viewpoint diversity.” When nearly everyone in a field shares the same political orientation, certain ideas become orthodoxy, dissent is discouraged, and errors can go unchallenged.

An Interpretation of Jonathan Haidt’s Moral Foundations Theory

This sidebar lists a series of posts which together make up an essay relating Moral Foundations Theory to today's politics, and even a little history, as viewed through The Independent Whig's six-foundation moral lens.


Venn Diagram of Liberal and Conservative Traits and Moral Foundations and

%d bloggers like this: