//
you're reading...
Uncategorized

Campus Protesters Match the Symptom List for Behavioral Disorders



This video illustrates how the thinking described by Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff in The Coddling of the American Mind can manifest in real life:


This is not an isolated incident. The mindset of “vindictive protectiveness” is taking over campuses across the country.
An anonymous column entitled I’m A Liberal Professor and My Students Terrify Me appeared on Vox.  Jonathan Chait wrote Can We Start Taking Political Correctness Seriously Now?

And it’s getting worse.  The vitriol endured by the Yale professor was so relentless that he and his wife who is also a professor there have decided not to teach next semester, saying they “worry that the current climate at Yale is not, in my view, conducive to the civil dialogue and open inquiry required to solve our urgent societal problems.”  The Dean of Students of Claremont McKenna College also resigned after suffering similar persecution. 

There’s a frightening similarity between the behaviors of the “safe space” protesters and the following list of Emotional Symptoms of Behavioral Disorders from the Boston Children’s Hospital and PsychGuides.com.  

  • Easily getting annoyed or nervous
  • Often appearing angry
  • Putting blame on others
  • Refusing to follow rules or questioning authority
  • Arguing and throwing temper tantrums
  • Having difficulty in handling frustration

There’s evidence that The Yale Problem Begins in High School.  I believe it Starts in Kindergarten. The suggestion is strong that twelve years of coddling by our primary and secondary education system, and potentially four more at university, creates entire generations of citizens with rates of behavioral disorders much higher than normal, or necessary.  What have we done?  What sorts of future leaders, workers, and teachers are we sending out into the world?

Discussion

5 thoughts on “Campus Protesters Match the Symptom List for Behavioral Disorders

  1. I’m not sure I agree with everything you’ve written there, but the concept of “vindictive protectiveness” reminds me of the concept of “defensive aggression” Research shows that oxytocin, the chemical linked to maternal behavior and social bonding, actually promotes aggression in defense of the loved one. See for instance

    http://www.research.leiden.edu/news/oxytocin-the-hugging-hormone-causes-agression-towards-competing-groups.html

    So compassionate people can actually get very angry and aggressive if they think those within the circle of their concern are in danger. I think that may be what is happening here.

    Like

    Posted by Rick Heller (@SecularMeditate) | December 10, 2015, 5:20 pm
    • This is fascinating. Wonderful info. Thanks for the insight and the link.

      Yes I think it’s true that many factors, traits, attributes, circumstances, etc. ultimately play a role in how and why people do the things we do. I don’t mean to imply that my post tells the whole story. I only mean to suggest a connection between things that maybe other people haven’t seen, or maybe a perspective from which interplay hasn’t been observed.

      Your comment fits very will with my understanding of how this all works.

      The liberal morality is made of the individualizing foundations of care, fairness, and liberty, and of those mostly just care. Liberals tend to be a lot more angry, and seem to act out a lot more, than conservatives. How often have you seen a protest march by conservatives in which they deliberately disrupt daily life for the local population and get up in the face of people they encounter. Practically never. But all of that often seems seems de rigueur for liberals. Google the BLM kids in the Dartmouth library. This corroborates, or is corroborated by, your final sentence, and with the overall sentiment of your comment.

      I wonder if anyone’s ever studied relative levels of oxytocin in liberals and conservatives.

      Thanks again.

      Like

      Posted by The Independent Whig | December 10, 2015, 8:44 pm

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: The Left Has Jumped the Shark | The Independent Whig - January 4, 2017

  2. Pingback: Campus Craziness is Not Just a Free Speech Crisis, It’s Also a Mental Health Crisis. | The Independent Whig - January 10, 2017

  3. Pingback: The Mental Health Crisis Nobody’s Talking About Explains Extremist Protesters | The Independent Whig - January 21, 2017

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

I Support Viewpoint Diversity

www.heterodoxacademy.org

A politically diverse group of social scientists, natural scientists, humanists, and other scholars who want to improve our academic disciplines and universities. We share a concern about a growing problem: the loss or lack of “viewpoint diversity.” When nearly everyone in a field shares the same political orientation, certain ideas become orthodoxy, dissent is discouraged, and errors can go unchallenged.

An Interpretation of Jonathan Haidt’s Moral Foundations Theory

This sidebar lists a series of posts which together make up an essay relating Moral Foundations Theory to today's politics, and even a little history, as viewed through The Independent Whig's six-foundation moral lens.

Categories

Venn Diagram of Liberal and Conservative Traits and Moral Foundations and

%d bloggers like this: